Updated at
30.06.2026
TL;DR: A SaaS dashboard is only as good as the decisions behind it. Define what action it should drive, map it to the right user roles, and surface only the metrics that trigger a response. From there, hierarchy and visual clarity do the heavy lifting. The teams that get it right ask the right questions before opening Figma.
SaaS dashboard design best practises | 1:32 min
No time to read? Listen via headphones, speakers or on the go

The dashboard is the first screen users see when they log in — and the first place they decide whether the product is worth their time.
Most dashboards are designed for completeness: to show everything and let users find what they need. That logic consistently produces screens nobody uses. A dashboard is a decision surface. Users arrive with a question, and the interface either answers it in seconds or loses them to a spreadsheet they'll build themselves.
At Goodface, we've shipped dashboards for fintech, edTech, eSports, and other SaaS platforms. What we see in every project: the first version the team proposes is more complex than what users need. The work is always about cutting toward clarity, not building toward completeness.
Before placing a chart, identify the decision the dashboard should help users make. That answer determines which metrics deserve immediate attention, which belong one level deeper, and which can be removed altogether.
To find out what’s missing, ask users what they currently compile manually outside the product — in spreadsheets, Slack threads, or email. That workaround is almost always the gap that the dashboard isn't filling.

A CEO, a product owner, or a manager looking at the same data through completely different lenses. Trying to satisfy all three in a single dashboard usually creates unnecessary complexity.
In practice, this means designing multiple dashboards rather than one. It feels like more work up front. It's less work than iterating on a cluttered single view for six months.

Ask one question for every KPI: What changes after someone sees this number? If the answer is unclear, move it lower in the hierarchy or remove it from the initial view.
Instead of general awareness of the situation, a KPI earns its position when a specific value or trend prompts a specific response.
The most challenging part here isn't identifying which metrics pass the test, but getting internal buy-in to deprioritize the ones that feel important but drive nothing.

Users read hierarchy before labels. Placement, spacing, and size determine what receives attention first, long before someone starts interpreting the data.
We structure layouts around three tiers:
A simple validation exercise — show the dashboard for five seconds, hide it, and ask what people remember. If the answer isn't the primary KPI, the hierarchy isn't strong enough.

One layout rule we deliberately follow: users scan left to right across the top, then down the left side. Top-left carries the most visual weight. Don't place a logo or navigation label there — that's where the most critical metric lives.
$1.26M in revenue tells a user nothing. Up or down? Versus what? Over which period? Revenue, conversion rate, or churn only become meaningful when users understand whether performance improved, declined, or reached a target.
Every metric needs at least one context anchor:
Reserve strong colors — red, amber, green — for status and alerts, and use them consistently. Color is the fastest signal on a dense screen. Spending it on decoration means losing it when it actually matters.

Users shouldn't spend time deciding where to go next. Their attention belongs to the task they're trying to complete.
Two strong patterns that hold up across product types:
Role-based defaults. Scope the opening view to the user's role and let them customize from there — not the reverse. New users don't know what they need yet; give them a curated starting point based on the most common use case for their role or tier.
Contextual drill-down. Embed exploration in place. Click a revenue number and a drawer reveals the breakdown by product, region, or cohort — without navigating away from the primary view. Users stay in their decision context instead of losing it.

Performance starts before data appears. Users form expectations while the interface loads, so the loading sequence deserves the same design attention as the finished dashboard.
Design for perceived performance: load the structural shell immediately with skeleton states for each component. Deliver primary KPIs first, secondary charts second, logs and tables last. If a data source is down, say so at the component level — a user should trust what's showing while knowing exactly what isn't.

Most dashboards are designed for their populated state. The empty state — new user, failed load, filter with no results — is treated as an edge case, costing real activation.
New users encounter an empty interface before they experience the product's value. Show what the dashboard will contain, explain how to populate it, and make the next action obvious.
When a filter returns nothing, "No results found" is the floor, not the solution. Suggest removing a filter, widening the date range, or checking the input. Every empty state should guide the user toward the next meaningful action.

The pattern you choose determines how users experience everything on top of it. Choosing wrong is one of the most common reasons a dashboard underperforms, even when the data is right.
Most products need more than one pattern across different sections or roles. The mistake is applying the one the team knows best across the entire product.

Byteful is a B2B proxy infrastructure platform for developers and technical buyers. The dashboard answers three operational questions on login: are my proxies active, how much bandwidth have I used, and is my account funded?

Read the full Ping Proxies case study here
QCI is a commodity intelligence platform for energy market professionals. The challenge: surface fast-moving price data, AI-generated market summaries, and editorial commentary in a single view — without turning a high-stakes trading screen into a news feed.
Cascad is a payment platform that helps finance teams instantly understand whether money is moving as expected and whether conversion rates remain healthy across multiple currencies.

See the full Cascad case study
This LMS dashboard serves a learner who checks in between sessions to see where they stand, what's in progress, and what to tackle next — motivation built into the interface.

Read the full CREO case study
365games is a competitive environment where users chase tournaments, leaderboards, and prize draws. The dashboard drives engagement as much as it reports it — every element pushes toward the next action.

See the full 365games case study
bill_line is a payment platform for merchants. We designed two fintech dashboards: an account overview for platform health monitoring and a transaction history view for investigating day-to-day activity. Each supports a different user goal.
Omni is a Discord community management platform. Server owners and community managers need to know whether their community is growing, how engaged members are, and who's driving activity — all without leaving the main view.

Read the full Omni case study
We work with SaaS teams from early product definition through launch and iteration. Dashboard UX is where we see the most consistent gap between what teams ship and what users actually need.
Our process starts with decision mapping — understanding what questions different user roles are trying to answer, and building information architecture around those questions rather than the data model. We prototype in low fidelity, test with real users early, and refine before writing a prod code.
An effective SaaS dashboard answers a specific user's question as quickly as possible. That means a clear visual hierarchy, metrics with built-in context, role-appropriate defaults, and a load sequence that prioritizes the most critical data. The test isn't how much a dashboard shows — it's how quickly a user can act on what they see.
Fewer than most teams want to ship. A primary view should carry 2–4 key metrics — the numbers that change behavior when they move. Secondary charts and breakdowns support those metrics but don't compete with them. If every metric looks equally important, none of them are. The discipline is deciding what belongs above the fold and having the confidence to move everything else down or out.
A report is pulled when someone needs to investigate something. A dashboard is always on — it's the screen users land on to get their bearings and decide what to do next. Reports answer "what happened and why." Dashboards answer "what should I pay attention to right now?" Designing a dashboard like a report — dense, comprehensive, built for analysis — is one of the most common reasons dashboards go unused.
In most B2B SaaS products, yes. An executive checking pipeline health, a manager tracking team performance, and an operator monitoring live activity have different questions, different tolerances for complexity, and different definitions of "urgent." A single dashboard that tries to serve all three simultaneously usually ends up as a compromise that satisfies none of them. Role-based defaults with optional customization are the pattern that holds up best across product types.
The empty state is a design-only problem. A new user landing on a blank dashboard needs to understand three things immediately: what this view will show once populated, what action they need to take to get there, and roughly how long that will take. An illustrated preview of the populated state, a single primary CTA, and a plain-language explanation of how data builds over time consistently outperform screens that simply say "No data yet.”
Use a number when the value itself is the insight. Use a chart when the shape — the trend, the distribution, the comparison — is what matters. A chart that could be replaced by a single stat card probably should be. Charts are expensive real estate: they take longer to read, require more explanation, and can obscure a simple truth that a well-contextualized number would convey more quickly. Every visualization on a dashboard should earn its space by answering a question that a number alone can’t.
Significantly. Users form an impression of a product's reliability within the first few seconds of using it, and a slow or incomplete load is read as instability — even if the data is accurate. Beyond trust, slow load times correlate directly with higher bounce rates from primary views. Designing for perceived performance — skeleton states, priority-ordered loading, component-level error messages — consistently improves engagement metrics without requiring backend changes.
Fill out the form
or brief with questions

Fill in a simple brief
We will respond during business hours

Request received
Welcome to Goodface privacy notice.
Goodface respects your privacy and is committed to protecting your personal data. This privacy notice will inform you as to how we look after your personal data when you visit our website (regardless of where you visit it from) and other sites we own and operate. And tell you about your privacy rights and how the law protects you.
We may change the privacy policy from time to time to reflect changes to the products and services that we provide and how we process your personal data.
We will not share your information with any third party outside of our organization, other than as necessary to fulfil your request if any."
When you visit our website, our servers may automatically log the standard data provided by your web browser. This data is considered “non-identifying information”, as it does not personally identify you on its own. It may include:
We may ask for personal information, such as your name and email address. This data is considered “identifying information”, as it can personally identify you. We only request personal information relevant to providing you with a service, and only use it to help provide or improve this service.
We collect information by fair and lawful means, with your knowledge and consent. We also let you know why we’re collecting it and how it will be used. You are free to refuse our request for this information, with the understanding that we may be unable to provide you with some of your desired services without it.
We will only process personal data and communicate with you if:
1. You have given us consent to the processing of your personal data and communicating for one or more specific purposes i.e. requesting products or services from us, downloading material or information from our website or submitting a contact us form.
2. Performance of a contract
3. Where we have a legitimate interest for contacting you in relation to our products and services
We only retain personal information for as long as necessary to provide a service, or to improve our services in future. While we retain this data, we will protect it within commercially acceptable means to prevent loss and theft, as well as unauthorised access, disclosure, copying, use or modification. That said, we advise that no method of electronic transmission or storage is 100% secure, and cannot guarantee absolute data security.
Rights and choices of individuals:
You may opt out of any future contacts from us at any time. You can do the following at any time by contacting us via the email address given on our website: goodface.agency